Human performance
Classified in Philosophy and ethics
Written at on English with a size of 1.55 KB.
In
Relation to the overall reading, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Meat and Marginal
Cases,” I do agree with many of the facts and theories about favoritism of
Certain animals: puppies, for example, like Norcross, the author, said; and the
fact that despite that Fred’s example of killing animals is a very alarming
One, that does not take the guilt away or give less of a culpability to meat,
Pork, and chicken consumers, etc., that we encounter nowadays. But as the
Reading goes on, the main argument involves the fact that, we do not see Fred’s
Case, the same way we see the fact that all these animals that human beings
Consume, also go through a very rough and mistreating process, for us to eat. However,
Is there any type of exception for those who eat Kashrut? (Kosher), (a set of
Jewish dietary laws.) The way Kosher works is based on causing the animal the
Less amount of pain possible. This idea is based on the fact that the animal
Should suffer the least amount possible on their death. So, if the Kosher
Lifestyle is one based on basically the “no-suffering” of animals, would this
Still have the same lack of “moral worth” than Fred’s actions and the rest of
The overall animal killing for eating purposes?